Natural slavery

en

WikiRank.net
ver. 1.6.2

Natural slavery

Quality:

Natural slavery - Aristotle's belief that some people are slaves by nature. Article “Natural slavery” in English Wikipedia has 28.5 points for quality (as of July 1, 2025). The article contains 13 references and 4 sections.

In this language version of Wikipedia the article has the best quality. Also, this article is the most popular in that (English) language version.

Since the creation of article “Natural slavery”, its content was written by 29 registered users of English Wikipedia and edited by 43 registered Wikipedia users in all languages.

The article is cited 120 times in English Wikipedia and cited 198 times in all languages.

The highest Authors Interest rank from 2001:

  • Local (English): #52124 in March 2019
  • Global: #181369 in March 2019

The highest popularity rank from 2008:

  • Local (English): #263565 in September 2020
  • Global: #447303 in June 2025

There are 5 language versions for this article in the WikiRank database (of the considered 55 Wikipedia language editions).

The quality and popularity assessment was based on Wikipédia dumps from July 1, 2025 (including revision history and pageviews for previous years).

The table below shows the language versions of the article with the highest quality.

Languages with the highest quality

#LanguageQuality gradeQuality score
1English (en)
Natural slavery
28.5244
2Portuguese (pt)
Escravidão natural
26.7741
3Persian (fa)
بردگی طبیعی
23.4773
4Simple English (simple)
Natural slavery
22.9079
5French (fr)
Esclavage par nature
17.1681
More...

The following table shows the most popular language versions of the article.

Most popular in all the time

The most popular language versions of the article "Natural slavery" in all the time
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Natural slavery
292 003
2Portuguese (pt)
Escravidão natural
4 730
3French (fr)
Esclavage par nature
3 286
4Persian (fa)
بردگی طبیعی
2 085
5Simple English (simple)
Natural slavery
54
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest popularity in the last month.

Most popular in June 2025

The most popular language versions of the article "Natural slavery" in June 2025
#LanguagePopularity awardRelative popularity
1English (en)
Natural slavery
3 759
2French (fr)
Esclavage par nature
116
3Portuguese (pt)
Escravidão natural
111
4Simple English (simple)
Natural slavery
48
5Persian (fa)
بردگی طبیعی
16
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest.

The highest AI

Language versions of the article "Natural slavery" with the highest Authors Interest (number of authors). Only registered Wikipedia users were taken into account.
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1English (en)
Natural slavery
29
2Persian (fa)
بردگی طبیعی
5
3French (fr)
Esclavage par nature
4
4Portuguese (pt)
Escravidão natural
4
5Simple English (simple)
Natural slavery
1
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest Authors’ Interest in the last month.

The highest AI in June 2025

Language versions of the article "Natural slavery" with the highest AI in June 2025
#LanguageAI awardRelative AI
1Simple English (simple)
Natural slavery
1
2English (en)
Natural slavery
0
3Persian (fa)
بردگی طبیعی
0
4French (fr)
Esclavage par nature
0
5Portuguese (pt)
Escravidão natural
0
More...

The following table shows the language versions of the article with the highest number of citations.

The highest CI

Language versions of the article "Natural slavery" with the highest Citation Index (CI)
#LanguageCI awardRelative CI
1English (en)
Natural slavery
120
2Portuguese (pt)
Escravidão natural
53
3Persian (fa)
بردگی طبیعی
21
4French (fr)
Esclavage par nature
2
5Simple English (simple)
Natural slavery
2
More...

Scores

Estimated value for Wikipedia:
English:
Global:
Popularity in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Popularity in all years:
English:
Global:
Authors in June 2025:
English:
Global:
Registered authors in all years:
English:
Global:
Citations:
English:
Global:

Quality measures

Interwikis

#LanguageValue
enEnglish
Natural slavery
faPersian
بردگی طبیعی
frFrench
Esclavage par nature
ptPortuguese
Escravidão natural
simpleSimple English
Natural slavery

Popularity rank trends

Best Rank English:
#263565
09.2020
Global:
#447303
06.2025

AI rank trends

Best Rank English:
#52124
03.2019
Global:
#181369
03.2019

Languages comparison

Important global interconnections (July 2024 – June 2025)

Wikipedia readers most often find their way to information on Natural slavery from Wikipedia articles about Politics, Aristotle, Proslavery, Valladolid debate and Aristotelianism. Whereas reading the article about Natural slavery people most often go to Wikipedia articles on Politics, Letter 47, Valladolid debate, Bartolomé de Las Casas and Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda.

Cumulative results of quality and popularity of the Wikipedia article

List of Wikipedia articles in different languages (starting with the most popular):

News from 21 February 2026

On 21 February 2026 in multilingual Wikipedia, Internet users most often read articles on the following topics: Jeffrey Epstein, Alysa Liu, Eric Dane, 2026 Winter Olympics, Rebecca Gayheart, Johannes Høsflot Klæbo, Wuthering Heights, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, John F. Kennedy Jr..

In English Wikipedia the most popular articles on that day were: Eric Dane, Alysa Liu, Rebecca Gayheart, Jeffrey Epstein, 2026 Winter Olympics, Eileen Gu, John F. Kennedy Jr., Carolyn Bessette Kennedy, Deaths in 2026, Johannes Høsflot Klæbo.

About WikiRank

The WikiRank project is intended for automatic relative evaluation of the articles in the various language versions of Wikipedia. At the moment the service allows to compare over 44 million Wikipedia articles in 55 languages. Quality scores of articles are based on Wikipedia dumps from July, 2025. When calculating current popularity and AI of articles data from June 2025 was taken into account. For historical values of popularity and AI WikiRank used data from 2001 to 2025... More information